|
| Thread Review for Stelzer Engine? (newest post first) |
|
Earle Bishop |
Posted on 3:45 pm on July 16, 2005 |
We would still have to gear down, or have an engine so large it would not fit on the platform. Even taking leveraging into account. We need a lot of torque. On a side note, Kingery has a (completely not MPS related) engine design, which struck me as a rotory Stelzer when I saw it. |
| |
|
kaempfer |
Posted on 1:37 pm on July 16, 2005 |
I was looking at different engine configurations on Wikipedia, and came across the Stelzer engine. It sounds perfect for a mech. It reciprocates, which means that you don't need complicated gearing to make the legs move back and forth. It's also very simple, which reduces the already high number of parts in a mech. http://www.faktuell.de/StelzerMotor/stelzermotor-index1.shtml It's in German, but you can plug it into Babelfish.
|
| |
|
|